Skip to main content

Pike v. State

Citations

  • 912 S.W.2d 431
  • 323 Ark. 56
  • 1996 Ark. LEXIS 23

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • stating “our duty is only to examine the record for error on objections decided adversely to the appellant, not to address arguments that might have been made”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Jesson

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

9 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

13 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.