Pike v. Rice

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that it was premature to dismiss a claim for bid chilling based on the facts alleged within the framework of the complaint
• holding that a notice that erroneously references a senior lien that had been cancelled plausibly could have chilled the bidding when the final price was grossly inadequate
• holding that appellant’s allegation that creditor conducted foreclosure sale despite knowing of inaccuracies in the published foreclosure advertisements “cannot be described as extreme, outrageous, atrocious, intolerable or beyond the bounds of decency”
• recognizing a viable wrongful foreclosure claim premised on a foreclosure notice that mistakenly stated that the property would be sold subject to a senior lien
• noting that a claim for punitive damages is derivative of a plaintiff’s substantive claims
• reversing dismissal of claims for wrongful foreclosure, breach of contract, breach of duty of good faith and fair dealing, and attorney fees

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).