Pike v. Finney

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding that our ability to review an issue was not hindered by a violation of Rule 2116(a) when the issue was identified in the argument section of the brief
• excusing appellant’s failure to include issue in statement of questions presented, where argument section of brief adequately identified issue
• “Generally, questions not presented in the ‘Statement of Questions Involved’ are deemed waived.”
• “Generally, questions not presented in the ‘Statement of Questions Involved’ are deemed waived.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).