Skip to main content
· 5/31/2001

Pike v. Clinton Fishpacking, Inc.

Citations

  • 143 F. Supp. 2d 162
  • 2001 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 7627
  • 2001 WL 604988

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • noting that “it is foreseeable that a fisherman recruited in Massachusetts might be injured aboard a vessel” elsewhere
  • finding the relatedness prong satisfied when the defendants recruited the plaintiff in Massachusetts although the alleged tort occurred in Alaska

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Lindsay

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.