Pik-Kwik Stores, Inc. v. Commission on Human Rights & Opportunities

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• addressing claim of sex discrimination but stating principle of reliance on federal law broadly to apply to all protected classes then enumerated in § 46a-60—race, color, national origin or sex
• addressing claim of sex discrimination but stating principle of reliance on federal law broadly to apply to all protected classes then enumerated in § 46a-60—race, color, national origin or sex
• employer refusing to hire male interviewee unless he cut his hair
• employer refusing to hire male interviewee unless he cut his hair
• ‘‘[a]lthough the language of [Title VII] and that of the [act] differ slightly, it is clear that the intent of the legislature . . . was to make the Connecticut statute coextensive with the federal’’
• private employer's hair-length regulations not discriminatory under statute

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).