Pigott v. Poe

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that “[t]o hold that gawking, pointing, and joking violates the prohibition against cruel and unusual punishment would trivialize the objective component of the Eighth Amendment test and render it absurd”
• concluding that “[t]o hold that gawking, pointing, and joking violates the prohibition against cruel and unusual punishment would trivialize the objective component of the Eighth Amendment test and render it absurd”
• stating that the Supreme Court “may have intended to strip the inmates of all Fourth Amendment privacy rights”
• stating that the Supreme Court “may have intended to strip the inmates of all Fourth Amendment privacy rights”
• stating that the Supreme Court \may have intended to strip the inmates of all Fourth Amendment privacy rights\
• stating that the Supreme Court \may have intended to strip the inmates of all Fourth Amendment privacy rights\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).