Skip to main content
· 1/27/2010

Pignataro v. Port Auth. of New York and New Jersey

Citations

  • 593 F.3d 265
  • 15 Wage & Hour Cas.2d (BNA) 1357
  • 2010 U.S. App. LEXIS 1840
  • 2010 WL 293056

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • where employer relied on “discussions with and ‘extensive research’ by the law department” in exempting employees from the Act’s requirements, it did not act willfully
  • willfulness is a question of fact

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Rendell, Barry, Chagares

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.