Skip to main content
· 3/11/1905

Pierson v. Peirce

Citations

  • 37 Wash. 443
  • 79 P. 1003
  • 1905 Wash. LEXIS 749

Syllabus

<p>Appeal and Error — Dismissal—Bonds—Amount of Supersedeas Bond — Monet Judgment — Interpleader. In an action of interpleader to recover a deposit in a bank, in which the money in controversy was deposited with the clerk of the court and judgment was entered ordering the clerk to pay it to the plaintiff, an appeal bond, conditioned also to effect a supersedeas, in a sum fixed by order of court, but less than double the amount of the judgment, is insufficient to give the supreme court jurisdiction of the appeal, and the appeal must be dismissed (Fullerton, J., dissenting).</p>

Judges: Fullerton, Rudkin

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.