Pierson v. Edstrom

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that police officer’s opinion regarding fault in an accident was an improper invasion of jury’s province and that the officer’s opinion testimony regarding speed was improper because the officer did not witness the accident
• holding it was error for the district court to admit witness testimony regarding the speed of a vehicle as the witness was not present at the scene and such opinion evidence invaded the jury’s province
• precluding police oQicer, who was not an eyewitness to the accident, ftom testifYing about the speed ofthe vehicle

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).