Pierre v. JC PENNEY CO., INC.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• examining whether \plaintiff's claims [we]re sufficient to allege a nexus between defendants and a state law\ (emphasis added)
• dismissing Fourth Amendment claim raised against private party in context of Section 1981 action
• “Plaintiff points to a number of state laws, the violation of which might satisfy the nexus requirement.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).