Tenth Circuit· 3/27/2007

Piercy v. Maketa

Citations

480 F.3d 1192
2007 U.S. App. LEXIS 7073
89 Empl. Prac. Dec. (CCH) 42,765
100 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 288
2007 WL 901911

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

concluding that “nothing suggests the proffered reasons for termination are weak, implausible, or inconsistent” or that the employer “acted in bad faith”
recognizing that absent additional evidence, a three-month separation between the protected activity and the adverse action was too great to justify an inference of causal connection
stating that “an adverse employment action that happened more than three months after the protected ac tivity was not entitled to a presumption of causation”
noting that plaintiff need not prove discriminatory motive when employment policy is discriminatory on its face
noting that we have found a proximity of three months insufficient to support “a presumption of causation”
noting that the Tenth Circuit has found a proximity of three months insufficient to support a “presumption of causation”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Briscoe, Baldock, Tymkovich

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

70 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

33 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.