Pierce v. Texas Racing Commission

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that racing commission did not exceed its authority or abuse its discretion in modifying ALJ recommendation as to penalty for horse racing violations
• concluding that state agency’s decision to modify ALJ’s conclusion of law complied with section 2001.058(e) and was not made through unlawful procedure
• concluding that racing commission did not exceed its authority or abuse its discretion in modifying ALJ recommendation as to penalty for horse racing violations
• determining that board complied with section 2001.058(e) where its order included three 7 paragraphs explaining specific reasons for modification of penalty
• determining that board complied with section 2001.058(e) where its order included explanation of its authority under statutes and rules of why modification of penalty was consistent with guidelines and board precedent
• determining that the board complied with section 2001.058(e) where its order included explanation of its authority under statutes and rules of why modification of penalty was consistent with guidelines and board precedent

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).