Skip to main content
· 12/11/1995

Pierce v. State Ex Rel. New Mexico Taxation & Revenue Department

Citations

  • 910 P.2d 288
  • 121 N.M. 212

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • concluding that a challenged award of costs “[was] not authorized by statute or precedent”
  • opining that public pensions create property — not contract — interest upon vesting, which matures upon fulfilling all retirement conditions
  • not allowing costs for expert witnesses who did not testify but submitted affidavits in support of a motion for summary judgment
  • detailing early use of voluntary/mandatory distinction

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Baca, Ransom, Santo

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.