Pierce v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding prior inconsistent statements were admissible where they were not cumulative of testimony elicited on cross examination
• reversing summary denial of postconviction motion, where record did not conclusively refute movant’s claim that counsel was ineffective for failing to impeach the State’s only witness — the victim — with' prior inconsistent statements
• \ 'To conclude that an action or inaction taken by a trial attorney was a strategic decision generally requires an evi-dentiary hearing.'\ (quoting Sampson v. State, 751 So.2d 602, 602 (Fla. 2d DCA 1998))

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

3 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Burns v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2015-06-22· cited 2×
• Smith v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2016-01-29· cited 1×
• Sidney Grant v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2016-12-22

Cites

8 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Strickland v. Washington
  Supreme Court· 1984-06-25· cited 123,578×
• Rodriguez v. State
  Supreme Court of Florida· 2000-02-03· cited 222×
• Morton v. State
  Supreme Court of Florida· 1997-03-06· cited 66×
• Sampson v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1998-11-20· cited 12×
• Marshall v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2011-08-26· cited 8×
• Bentley v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2004-02-26· cited 5×
• Varas v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2001-12-05· cited 4×
• Nelson v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2012-10-17· cited 3×