Pierce v. Pierce
Citations
- 68 Wash. 415
- 123 P. 598
- 1912 Wash. LEXIS 1305
Syllabus
<p>Divorce — Grounds—Indignities—Evidence-—Sufficiency. A divorce sought by a husband on the ground of indignities is properly denied, where it appears that the wife’s impatient and bitter remarks made in the presence of the children, which constitute the only substantiated charge against her, were provoked, by the conduct of the husband, who had deserted his wife and family.</p> <p>Divorce — Grounds—Inability to Live Together. Rem. & Bal. Code, § 982, subd. 7, authorizing a divorce “for any other cause deemed by the court sufficient, and the court shall be satisfied the parties can no longer live together” should not be granted against a wife who is not at fault and who is willing to attempt to continue the marriage relation, simply because it appears that the parties can no longer live together; since there must be some other sufficient cause.</p> <p>Divorce — Costs—-Attorney’s Fees. On appeal by the husband from the dismissal of his divorce action, the supreme court will not allow further costs to the wife, where the trial court allowed her $2,000 for expenses and $3,000 for attorney’s fees, and she is financially able to meet additional expenses incurred.</p>
Judges: Crow
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
6 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Schirmer v. SchirmerWashington Supreme Court· 1915-02-01· cited 15×
- Pierce v. PierceWashington Supreme Court· 1922-06-15· cited 14×
- Pierce v. PierceWashington Supreme Court· 1919-05-15· cited 11×
- McMillan v. McMillanWashington Supreme Court· 1920-11-29· cited 6×
- Spute v. SputeWashington Supreme Court· 1913-08-11· cited 5×
- Hilleware v. HillewareWashington Supreme Court· 1916-07-07· cited 3×
Cites
5 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Stanley v. StanleyWashington Supreme Court· 1901-04-05· cited 11×
- McDougall v. McDougallWashington Supreme Court· 1893-02-27· cited 11×
- Colvin v. ColvinWashington Supreme Court· 1896-11-12· cited 10×
- Bickford v. BickfordWashington Supreme Court· 1910-03-24· cited 9×
- Bloom v. BloomWashington Supreme Court· 1910-01-18· cited 6×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.