Indiana Court of Appeals· 9/15/1993
Pierce v. Pierce
Citations
- 620 N.E.2d 726
- 1993 Ind. App. LEXIS 1078
- 1993 WL 346593
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- “A parent may not sow seeds of discord and reap improved custody rights.”
- “The trial court found that [father] behaved in such way as to deprive [mother] of an opportunity to materially participate in the children’s upbringing. If the reasonableness of joint custody were not at issue, this course of conduct would not support a change in custody.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Baker, Robertson, Garrard
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
18 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Carmichael v. SiegelIndiana Court of Appeals· 2001-08-31· cited 112×
- Hanson v. SpolnikIndiana Court of Appeals· 1997-08-29· cited 75×
- Joe v. LebowIndiana Court of Appeals· 1996-07-18· cited 61×
- Haley v. HaleyIndiana Court of Appeals· 2002-07-18· cited 44×
- Phillip J. Troyer v. Tracy L. TroyerIndiana Court of Appeals· 2013-04-30· cited 39×
- Meade v. LevettIndiana Court of Appeals· 1996-08-15· cited 35×
- In Re Paternity of MPMWIndiana Court of Appeals· 2009-07-09· cited 24×
- Marriage of Spoor v. SpoorIndiana Court of Appeals· 1994-10-31· cited 12×
- Marriage of Huffman v. HuffmanIndiana Court of Appeals· 1993-11-16· cited 6×
- Doubiago v. McClarneyIndiana Court of Appeals· 1995-12-27· cited 5×
- Kelly Cornell F/K/A Kelly Cornell Mecartney v. David Laurence MecartneyWyoming Supreme Court· 2025-09-03· cited 4×
- A.W. v. Z.B.Indiana Court of Appeals· 2009-07-09· cited 1×
- In Re the Paternity of N.W., M.A. v. N.W. (mem. dec.)Indiana Court of Appeals· 2015-06-17
- Jenny R. (Willison) Eggerling v. Anthony Willison (mem. dec.)Indiana Court of Appeals· 2016-05-13
- In re the Marriage of: David A. Anzelmo v. Elizabeth M. Anzelmo (mem. dec.)Indiana Court of Appeals· 2016-08-31
- J.R.H. v. O.M.H. (mem. dec.)Indiana Court of Appeals· 2017-08-10
- In Re: The Paternity of V.A.C., Benjamin T. Colburn v. Raliza v. Pashova (mem. dec.)Indiana Court of Appeals· 2018-07-03
- In the Matter of Paternity of B.Y., Andrea Yanes-Mirabal v. Pardeep BadasayIndiana Supreme Court· 2020-12-18
Cites
21 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Lamb v. WenningIndiana Supreme Court· 1992-10-05· cited 71×
- Marriage of Poret v. MartinIndiana Supreme Court· 1982-05-07· cited 53×
- Wible v. WibleIndiana Supreme Court· 1964-03-05· cited 51×
- Marriage of Pea v. PeaIndiana Court of Appeals· 1986-10-09· cited 39×
- Musselman v. MusselmanIndiana Supreme Court· 1873-11-15· cited 33×
- Elbert v. ElbertIndiana Court of Appeals· 1991-09-30· cited 31×
- Marriage of Wilk v. WilkMissouri Court of Appeals· 1989-12-05· cited 27×
- Simons v. SimonsIndiana Court of Appeals· 1991-02-11· cited 26×
- Owen v. OwenIndiana Supreme Court· 1990-12-13· cited 26×
- Whalen v. WhalenIndiana Court of Appeals· 1991-01-29· cited 17×
- Dunlap v. DunlapIndiana Court of Appeals· 1985-03-28· cited 16×
- Marshall County Redi-Mix, Inc. v. MatthewIndiana Supreme Court· 1984-01-16· cited 16×
- Schenk v. SchenkIndiana Court of Appeals· 1991-01-17· cited 14×
- Riddlesbarger v. RiddlesbargerAppellate Court of Illinois· 1944-11-06· cited 13×
- Drake v. WashburnIndiana Court of Appeals· 1991-03-18· cited 12×
- In Re Paternity of SeifertIndiana Court of Appeals· 1993-01-19· cited 9×
- Beeson v. ChristianIndiana Court of Appeals· 1991-12-31· cited 8×
- In Re the Marriage of FergusonIndiana Court of Appeals· 1988-02-23· cited 7×
- Strand Amusement Co. v. City of OwensboroCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976)· 1932-03-15· cited 6×
- Marriage of Bingaman v. BingamanIndiana Court of Appeals· 1991-11-06· cited 5×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.