Skip to main content
· 8/28/2003

Pierce v. Ohio Department of Rehabilitation & Corrections

Citations

  • 284 F. Supp. 2d 811
  • 2003 WL 22246940

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “any expectation of privacy [correctional officers] have is unquestionably diminished given the setting of their employment.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Dowd

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.