Pierce v. Metropolitan Life Insurance

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• observing that \[c]ourts have routinely treated the failure to make payments according to an agreed-upon schedule as the breach of an installment contract\
• noting that at the time, the continuing violation doctrine did not apply because the New Hampshire Supreme Court had “shown no inclination to incorporate the doctrine as an exception to the state’s general statutes of limitation.” (quotation and brackets omitted)
• “New Hampshire follows the ‘universal rule that when an obligation is to be paid in installments the statute of limitations runs only against each installment as it becomes due . . . .’”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).