Skip to main content
· 10/27/1919

Pierce v. Fioretti

Citations

  • 140 Ark. 306
  • 215 S.W. 646
  • 1919 Ark. LEXIS 127

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • considering a Massachusetts case “as background” when discussing a Sheets claim
  • right of action would not unduly impair attorney-client relationship already likely in considerable disarray
  • no persuasive per se rationale for barring wrongful termination suits by in-house attorneys

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Wood

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.