Pierce v. Cook & Co., Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• trial court properly concluded that provision for extension of time in case of delay precluded recovery of monetary damages for such delay
• “The words ‘subject to’ usually indicate a condi- tion to one party’s duty of performance and not a promise by the other.”
• extension of time clause “does not necessarily provide an exemption …. for [the general contractor’s] delay”
• “unreasonable delay is a breach of an implied obligation not to hinder or delay the other party’s performance, in the absence of a contract clause contemplating and excusing the delay”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).