Pierce v. AAA Cabinet Co.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• where the Board determined that the employee had recovered and this court affirmed a change in condition finding
• “Since appellant’s continued unemployment is not due to his former disability, the employer has no further responsibility for appellant’s economic condition. That being so, there was no necessity that appellee show that work is available to appellant.”
• “Since appellant’s continued unemployment is not due to his former disability, the employer has no further responsibility for appellant’s economic condition. That being so, 6 there was no necessity that appellee show that work is available to appellant.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).