Pierce, Joseph Michael

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• emphasizing that “the adversary complaint and proceeding met Rule 4003’s procedural requirements,” including the 30-day time bar
• declining to “adopt a hypertechnical interpretation of Rule 4003 where its purpose to 6 ‘provide the debtor with timely notice’ has been clearly satisfied”
• debtor did not attempt to amend 27 exemptions after the entry of a final order
• “Moreover, 13 Rule 4003(c) provides that in any hearing under the rule, ‘the objecting party has the burden of proving 14 that the exemptions are not properly claimed.’”
• adversary complaint met Rule 4003’s procedural requirements and was timely filed
• “Hawaii law exempts [entireties] interests from creditors of an individual spouse.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).