Supreme Court· 1/14/2003
Pierce County v. Guillen
Citations
- 537 U.S. 129
- 123 S. Ct. 720
- 154 L. Ed. 2d 610
- 2003 U.S. LEXIS 747
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- concluding that courts should interpret § 409 narrowly because it “impede[s] the search for the truth”
- explaining that the court should look to the purpose for which the information is compiled in determining whether it was compiled to meet a statutory duty
- holding that § 409 protects “not just the information an agency generates, i.e., compiles, for § 152 purposes, but also any information that an agency 4 collects from other sources for § 152 purposes,” and further holding that § 409 does not violate Commerce Clause
- observing that courts do not presume that Congress would perform “a useless act”
- upholding a Commerce Clause challenge because “Congress could reasonably believe” that the statute affected interstate commerce
- upholding a Commerce Clause challenge because \Congress could reasonably believe\ that the statute affected interstate commerce
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Thomas
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
105 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Muehler v. MenaSupreme Court· 2005-03-22· cited 937×
- Rapanos v. United StatesSupreme Court· 2006-06-19· cited 416×
- Illinois v. LidsterSupreme Court· 2004-01-13· cited 398×
- State v. PerezOhio Supreme Court· 2009-12-02· cited 306×
- Dreiling v. JainWashington Supreme Court· 2004-06-24· cited 157×
- NEIGHBORHOOD ALLIANCE OF SPOKANE v. SpokaneWashington Supreme Court· 2011-09-29· cited 140×
- Soter v. Cowles Publishing Co.Washington Supreme Court· 2007-12-27· cited 125×
- Soter v. Cowles Pub. Co.Washington Supreme Court· 2007-12-27· cited 122×
- Ileto v. Glock, Inc.Ninth Circuit· 2009-05-11· cited 102×
- Medeiros v. Atlantic States MariFirst Circuit· 2005-12-12· cited 87×
- McConnell v. Federal Election CommissionDistrict of Columbia· 2003-05-01· cited 85×
- Miller UK Ltd. v. Caterpillar, Inc.N.D. Illinois· 2014-01-06· cited 69×
- State v. RiceWashington Supreme Court· 2012-06-28· cited 61×
- Mark Suesz v. Med-1 Solutions, LLCSeventh Circuit· 2014-07-02· cited 52×
- Maria Cazorla v. Koch Foods of Mississippi, LLCFifth Circuit· 2016-09-27· cited 52×
- United States v. Jay Scott BallingerEleventh Circuit· 2005-01-10· cited 49×
- Moore v. HarperSupreme Court· 2023-06-27· cited 49×
- Robert Zimmerman v. Norfolk Southern CorporationThird Circuit· 2013-01-23· cited 47×
- Sharbono v. Universal Underwriters Ins. Co.Court of Appeals of Washington· 2007-06-26· cited 42×
- Sharbono v. Universal Underwriters InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Washington· 2007-06-26· cited 39×
Cites
29 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- United States v. NixonSupreme Court· 1974-07-24· cited 4,095×
- United States v. LopezSupreme Court· 1995-04-26· cited 3,052×
- Stone v. Immigration & Naturalization ServiceSupreme Court· 1995-04-19· cited 1,703×
- Cox Broadcasting Corp. v. CohnSupreme Court· 1975-03-03· cited 1,289×
- United States v. DarbySupreme Court· 1941-02-17· cited 1,152×
- Heart of Atlanta Motel, Inc. v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1965-01-25· cited 912×
- Asarco Inc. v. KadishSupreme Court· 1989-05-30· cited 702×
- Perez v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1971-04-26· cited 647×
- University of Pennsylvania v. Equal Employment Opportunity CommissionSupreme Court· 1990-01-09· cited 608×
- Houston, East & West Texas Railway Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1914-06-08· cited 515×
- Hodel v. IndianaSupreme Court· 1981-06-15· cited 435×
- Southern Railway Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1911-10-30· cited 276×
- Duquesne Light Co. v. BaraschSupreme Court· 1989-01-11· cited 265×
- Market Street Railway Co. v. Railroad Commission of CaliforniaSupreme Court· 1945-04-02· cited 240×
- St. Regis Paper Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1962-01-15· cited 224×
- National Collegiate Athletic Assn. v. SmithSupreme Court· 1999-02-23· cited 216×
- Baldrige v. ShapiroSupreme Court· 1982-02-24· cited 185×
- Wiedeman v. Dixie Elec. Membership Corp.Supreme Court of Louisiana· 1993-11-29· cited 40×
- Jefferson v. City of TarrantSupreme Court· 1997-12-09· cited 32×
- Odis Robertson v. Union Pacific Railroad CompanyEighth Circuit· 1992-01-27· cited 29×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.