Skip to main content
· 9/28/1995

Pier Connection, Inc. v. Lakhani

Citations

  • 907 F. Supp. 72
  • 1995 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 14213
  • 1995 WL 575333

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • finding no open-ended continuity where defendants would reap the benefits of defaming plaintiff and stealing customers
  • no elosedended continuity when plaintiffs were the “sole victim” and “Defendants engaged in one scheme whose single goal was to seize control of Pier Connection’s business”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Scheindlin

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.