· 9/28/1995
Pier Connection, Inc. v. Lakhani
Citations
- 907 F. Supp. 72
- 1995 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 14213
- 1995 WL 575333
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- finding no open-ended continuity where defendants would reap the benefits of defaming plaintiff and stealing customers
- no elosedended continuity when plaintiffs were the “sole victim” and “Defendants engaged in one scheme whose single goal was to seize control of Pier Connection’s business”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Scheindlin
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.