Piemonte v. New Boston Garden Corp.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• without referring to a burden of proof, Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court concludes that weightings by trial court were “reasonable” and within its discretion
• upholding judge’s method of valuing Boston Garden Arena Corporation stock
• judge was not required to assign a specific weight to market value or to rely exclusively on net asset value but, instead, “the judge was acting within an acceptable range of discretion in selecting the weights he gave to the various factors”
• judge not required to believe evidence even when uncontroverted
• describing Delaware corporate law as “instructive but not binding”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).