Piedra v. 111 W. 57th Prop. Owner LLC

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• recognizing that, when statutes act as directives to federal agencies, there is little reason to infer a private remedy in favor of individuals
• concluding that Congress did not intend to create a federal rights under section 10 of the Rivers and Harbors Appropriation Act
• noting that the second two factors \are only of relevance if the first two factors give indication of congressional intent to create the remedy\
• explaining that, while congressional intent to create a private right of action is dispositive, that intent can often be determined by considering the Cort factors
• stating that the last two Cort factor are irrelevant unless \the first two factors give indication of congressional intent to create the remedy\
• noting that the last two Cort factors \are only of relevance if the first two factors give indication of congressional intent to create the remedy\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).