· 5/16/1932
Piedmont & Northern Railway Co. v. Interstate Commerce Commission
Citations
- 286 U.S. 299
- 52 S. Ct. 541
- 76 L. Ed. 1115
- 1932 U.S. LEXIS 818
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- “The Transportation Act was remedial legislation, and should therefore be given a liberal interpretation.... ”
- “These [electric railways] are essentially local, are fundamentally passenger carriers, are to an inconsiderable extent engaged in interstate carriage, and transact freight business only incidentally and in small volume.”
- “The Transportation Act was remedial legislation, and should therefore be given a liberal interpretation; ... but for the same reason exemptions from its sweep should be narrowed and limited to effect the remedy intended.”
- remedial legislation should be given a liberal interpretation
- remedial legislation should be given a liberal interpretation
- construing a similar exclusion in the Interstate Commerce Act
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Roberts
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.