Skip to main content
· 5/16/1932

Piedmont & Northern Railway Co. v. Interstate Commerce Commission

Citations

  • 286 U.S. 299
  • 52 S. Ct. 541
  • 76 L. Ed. 1115
  • 1932 U.S. LEXIS 818

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “The Transportation Act was remedial legislation, and should therefore be given a liberal interpretation.... ”
  • “These [electric railways] are essentially local, are fundamentally passenger carriers, are to an inconsiderable extent engaged in interstate carriage, and transact freight business only incidentally and in small volume.”
  • “The Transportation Act was remedial legislation, and should therefore be given a liberal interpretation; ... but for the same reason exemptions from its sweep should be narrowed and limited to effect the remedy intended.”
  • remedial legislation should be given a liberal interpretation
  • remedial legislation should be given a liberal interpretation
  • construing a similar exclusion in the Interstate Commerce Act

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Roberts

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.