Skip to main content
· 10/19/1932

Piedmont Financial Co. v. Commissioner

Citations

  • 26 B.T.A. 1221
  • 1932 BTA LEXIS 1168

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding an arrestee loses any privacy interest in personal items already searched and stored pursuant to a valid inventory search
  • holding prisoner lacks privacy interest in personal items lawfully searched and stored by prison
  • holding prisoner lacks privacy interest in personal items lawfully searched and stored by prison
  • “[T]he trial court must carefully consider whether expert testimony on the reliability of eyewitness identification would assist the jury in assessing the reliability of eyewitness testimony.”
  • even where the relevance and helpfulness of expert witness testimony is debatable, there is no error if the decision to exclude is based on tenable grounds
  • officers who arrested defendant for rape could use his shoes to compare the prints to those left at the scene of an unrelated rape

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Akundell

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.