Piedade Pedro De Almeida, Harber Corporation, Gatex Corporation, Mabon Corporation v. United States

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• explaining that jurisdiction under 3 Rule 41 must be “exercised with great restraint and caution” (internal quotation marks omitted)
• “[t]he statutory wording makes sufficiently clear that criminal forfeiture is not a measure restricted to property owned by the criminal defendant .... ”
• “An ancillary proceeding is evidently the only avenue for a post-indictment third-party claim to forfeited property ....”
• “A Rule 41(g) motion is an equitable remedy that is available only when there is no adequate remedy at law....”
• criminal forfeiture “reaches any property that is ‘involved’ in the offense.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).