Skip to main content
· 4/15/2005

Pidcock v. Ewing

Citations

  • 371 F. Supp. 2d 870
  • 58 U.C.C. Rep. Serv. 2d (West) 129
  • 2005 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 10758
  • 2005 WL 1298114

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “The record shows that [Defendant] only repaired the house portion of the motor home, not the chassis. Because the house portion is specifically excluded from coverage, the [Plaintiffs] cannot make out a claim for a violation of the MVSRA against [Defendant]”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Cohn

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.