Pickett v. Texas Mutual Insurance Co.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that similar agreement, although it did not constitute determination of benefits due because it did not address benefits, did resolve compensability issue
• noting that similar agreement, although it did not constitute determination of benefits due because it did not address benefits, did resolve compensability issue
• noting that similar agreement, although it did not constitute determination of benefits due because it did not address benefits, did resolve compensability issue
• contrasting allegations made in the trial court with content of a benefit dispute agreement and concluding that claimant failed to exhaust administrative remedies regarding claims that were not addressed in the agreement
• similarly holding that Texas Supreme Court decision applied retroactively in the absence of any contrary indication in that opinion
• existence of benefit dispute agreement addressing causal connection between psychological disorders and compensable back injury did not obviate need to exhaust administrative remedies regarding necessity of specific medical treatments for psychological disorders

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).