Skip to main content
· 10/14/1946

Pickett v. Bowles

Citations

  • 329 U.S. 736
  • 67 S. Ct. 45
  • 91 L. Ed. 636
  • 1946 U.S. LEXIS 2028

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • noting that no one public use would be destroyed or greatly impaired and that the benefit to public use outweighed the harm
  • prohibiting substantial destruction of navigable waters through land reclamation
  • prohibiting substantial destruction of navigable waters through land reclamation

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.