Skip to main content
· 4/15/1843

Pickering v. Langdon

Citations

  • 22 Me. 413

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that, under Reata , immunity from suit applies even to a counterclaim for attorney's fees unless the fees can serve as an offset against the government's monetary recovery
  • holding that allowing a waiver-by-conduct exception thwarts the 43 43565622v.7 43565622v.9 Legislature’s balance of competing private and public interests
  • holding that, under Reata, immunity from suit applies even to a counterclaim for attorney’s fees unless the fees can serve as an offset against the government’s monetary recovery
  • recognizing that economic loss rule can apply where there is no privity of contract
  • concluding that specific performance was foreclosed because “an adequate remedy at law exists”
  • stating that person is not third-party beneficiary simply because he is directly affected by contracting parties’ conduct or has substantial interest in contract’s enforcement

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Shepley

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.