Pickel v. SPRINGFIELD STALLIONS, INC.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• explaining that in other contact sports, participant liability may be premised on intentional misconduct or “conscious disregard” for another participant’s safety
• explaining that in other contact sports, participant liability may be premised on intentional misconduct or \conscious disregard\ for another participant's safety
• stating a pleading “must allege facts sufficient to comprise a legally recognized cause of action, not bare conclusions”
• “ ‘Well-pleaded facts’ is a term that stands in contrast to ‘conclusions.’ ”
• “ ‘Well-pleaded facts’ is a term that stands in contrast to ‘conclusions.’ ”
• “ ‘Well-pleaded facts’ is a term that stands in contrast to ‘conclusions.’ ”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).