Pichotta v. City of Skagway

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding the court lacked jurisdiction over the case in part because the RSA’s “specific and comprehensive” arbitration scheme “preempts any Tucker Act jurisdiction that might otherwise exist”
• noting the expansive construction of “procurement” but questioning whether a “procurement” exists where “a federal agency does not elect to solicit bids or offers to enter into a contract” (emphasis added)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).