Texas Supreme Court· 5/15/1957
Pich v. Lankford
Citations
- 302 S.W.2d 645
- 157 Tex. 335
- 7 Oil & Gas Rep. 628
- 1957 Tex. LEXIS 593
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- recognizing default rule that a reserved royalty interest “would be carved proportionately from the two mineral ownerships”
- determining the former types of cases were not controlling when a grantor fails to convey part of the estate he owns through an exception
- the words A exception @ and A reservation @ are not strictly synonymous but are often used interchangeably
- “The words ‘exception’ and ‘reservation’ are not strictly synonymous . . ., but they are often used interchangeably.”
- the words \exception\ and \reservation\ are not strictly synonymous but are often used interchangeably
- in favor of Pich, who obtained the grantor’s interest in each deed
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Calvert, Garwood
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
48 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- McMahon v. ChristmannTexas Supreme Court· 1957-05-29· cited 118×
- Benedict G. Wenske and Elizabeth Wenske v. Steve Ealy and Deborah EalyTexas Supreme Court· 2017-06-23· cited 81×
- Perryman v. Spart an Tex. Six Capital Partners, Ltd.Texas Supreme Court· 2018-04-27· cited 76×
- Brown v. HavardTexas Supreme Court· 1980-01-16· cited 74×
- Mills v. BrownTexas Supreme Court· 1958-10-15· cited 61×
- Waters v. EllisTexas Supreme Court· 1958-04-16· cited 50×
- Bagby v. BredthauerCourt of Appeals of Texas· 1981-12-02· cited 45×
- Canter v. LindseyCourt of Appeals of Texas· 1978-11-29· cited 27×
- Patrick v. BarrettTexas Supreme Court· 1987-06-17· cited 26×
- Wright v. E.P. Operating Ltd. PartnershipTex. App. Ct., 11th Dist. (Eastland)· 1998-11-25· cited 20×
- Kitchens v. KitchensCourt of Appeals of Texas· 1963-10-24· cited 19×
- Ladd v. Du BoseCourt of Appeals of Texas· 1961-02-20· cited 18×
- Pan American Petroleum Corp. v. CainTexas Supreme Court· 1962-01-17· cited 18×
- Union Oil Co. of Cal. v. ColglazierSupreme Court of Alabama· 1978-07-21· cited 16×
- Melton v. DavisCourt of Appeals of Texas· 1969-05-29· cited 15×
- Bright v. JohnsonTex. App. Ct., 11th Dist. (Eastland)· 2009-12-10· cited 13×
- York v. Kenilworth Oil Co.Court of Appeals of Texas· 1981-03-05· cited 10×
- Fuentes v. HirschCourt of Appeals of Texas· 1971-10-06· cited 9×
- Cantley v. HubbardSupreme Court of Alabama· 1993-06-25· cited 5×
- Miller v. MeldeCourt of Appeals of Texas· 1987-03-05· cited 5×
Cites
9 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Woods v. SimsTexas Supreme Court· 1954-12-08· cited 172×
- Benge v. ScharbauerTexas Supreme Court· 1953-06-17· cited 144×
- Reynolds v. McMan Oil & Gas Co.Texas Commission of Appeals· 1928-12-12· cited 134×
- Gibson v. SellarsCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976)· 1952-12-19· cited 28×
- Oldham v. FortnerMississippi Supreme Court· 1954-10-11· cited 16×
- Ambs v. Chicago, St. Paul, Minneapolis & Omaha Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota· 1890-08-19· cited 13×
- Georgia Vitrified Brick & Clay Co. v. Georgia Railroad & Banking Co.Supreme Court of Georgia· 1919-01-14· cited 8×
- Methodist Home v. MaysCourt of Appeals of Texas· 1954-11-11· cited 6×
- Pich v. LankfordCourt of Appeals of Texas· 1956-10-22· cited 5×
Other cases named Pich v. Lankford
1 other CourtListener record shares this case name.
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.