Piccuirro v. Gaitenby

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that a demand letter generally alleging a violation of c. 93A was sufficient where the letter described the underlying facts with reasonable specificity
• concluding that a demand letter generally alleging a violation of c. 93A was sufficient where the letter described the underlying facts with reasonable specificity
• holding c. 93A defendant jointly and severally liable with contract defendant for compensatory damages, but basing multiple damages against c. 93A defendant on whole amount of compensatory award
• suit by homeowners against real estate broker premised on violations of state environmental code and conflict-of interest statute
• exposure to multiple damages under c. 93A can be avoided by making a reasonable settlement offer
• unfair and deceptive practice where defendant, a broker, used his position as member of town board of health to approve defective sewer system on property he was selling

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).