Picard v. Fish

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• providing that “plaintiffs need to present more than their own unsupported speculation and conclusory allegations to survive”
• looking to federal ADA and Rehabilitation Act cases for guidance on similar disability non-discrimination language in MFEPA
• describing what qualifies as being regarded as having a disability under the ADA Amendments Act
• listing the elements of a disability discrimination claim based on an allegedly unlawful termination under the Maryland FEPA, which generally mirror those under federal disability statutes
• noting that MFEPA is modeled after Title VII
• listing, as part of a prima facie case for failure to accommodate claim, demonstration “that with reasonable accommodation, he or she could perform the essential functions of the position”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).