Picard v. Bay Area Regional Transit District

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding the state's interest in resolving a takings claim insufficient to implicate Sec. 1367(c)(4) when the result would be to bifurcate the action
• applying Gibbs in interpreting section 1367(c)(2)
• applying Gibbs in interpreting section 1367(e)(2)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).