Piazzola v. Watkins

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• upholding challenge to charge of violating Section 231(a)(3) because “the indictment sets forth all the elements of Section 231(a)(3), hewing closely to the language of the statute, and contains date and location of the offense”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).