Skip to main content
· 5/7/1996

Pianovski v. Laurel Motors, Inc.

Citations

  • 924 F. Supp. 86
  • 1996 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 6236
  • 1996 WL 243040

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “A phone call to the Clerk and an instruction to a docketing employee are insufficient to demonstrate diligence.”
  • “A phone call to the Clerk and an instruction to a docketing employee are insufficient to demonstrate diligence. Laurel should have taken further action to determine whether Chase had been served, such as attempting to contact Chase.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Bucklo

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.