Physicians Insurance v. Callahan

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that “[t]he insurance industry has long recognized the unsatisfactory nature of the relationship between primary and excess carriers”
• noting that, “[b]ecause of its less frequent exposure, the excess carrier generally charges lower premiums”
• declaring invalid a regulation promulgated in violation of the Documents Law and Review Act
• relying on Ohio Casualty to permit an action against the CAT Fund for coverage in the Commonwealth Court’s original jurisdiction and noting the adversarial relationship that this Court recognized that at times exists between the CAT Fund and other medical malpractice insurers

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).