Phyllis Jaskey Jones v. Chemetron Corporation

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that a confirmation order does not discharge a claim when the claimant did not have notice of the proceedings
• holding that if a claimant who was unborn at the time of confirmation had a “claim,” it was not discharged when no representative had been appointed to represent his interests in the bankruptcy
• holding that if a claimant who was unborn at the time of confirmation had a “claim,” it was not discharged when no representative had been appointed to represent his interests in the bankruptcy
• “[I]f a potential claimant lacks sufficient notice of a bankruptcy proceeding, due process 3 “Under § 524(g
• ‘We review the bankruptcy court’s ultimate determination regarding the existence of excusable neglect for abuse of discretion.”
• “We are cognizant of the criticism the Frenville decision has engendered, but it remains the law of this circuit.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).