Phuc Van Tran v. United States

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• rejecting party’s 28 2 The Court applies New York law consistent with the Supply Agreement’s choice-of-law provision. (See 59-1 at 9
• rejecting cable-provider’s argument that contract did not obligate it to provide customers with access to any channels because that interpretation would mean the cable-provider had “not really promised to provide anything and the contract [would be] arguably illusory”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).