Skip to main content
· 3/28/1988

Phototron Corporation v. Eastman Kodak Company, Fuqua Industries, Inc., and Colorcraft Corporation

Citations

  • 842 F.2d 95
  • 1988 U.S. App. LEXIS 4912
  • 1988 WL 25358

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “Advertising that creates barriers to entry in a market constitutes predatory behavior of the type the antitrust .laws are designed to prevent.”
  • “[A] competitor of two merging entities has standing to challenge the merger if an allegation and proof of predatory pricing is made.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Brown, Gee, Garwood

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.