Photometric Products Corp. v. Radtke

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that to establish plain error, the appellant must show a deviation from the legal rule that is both an obvious and affected the trial's outcome
• holding that the plain error doctrine justifies reversal only if: (1) there is error: (2) that is \plain\ at the time it was committed: and (3) that affected the defendant's substantial rights and therefore the outcome of the proceeding
• stating that an error affects substantial rights under Crim.R. 52(B) only if it affects the outcome of the trial
• noting that for error to be plain, it must be obvious error under current law
• stating that a “plain” error is an “obvious” error
• stating that a “plain” error is an “obvious” error

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).