Skip to main content
Ninth Circuit· 10/28/2020

Phong Lam v. United States

Citations

  • 979 F.3d 665

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “it is well-established that negligence is not 13 part of the discretionary function exception analysis.”
  • “[T]he district court must not focus on or even consider the employee’s actual thinking about what to do or not do.”
  • “[C]ourts should put the negligence issue aside on a [discretionary function exception]-based motion to dismiss and focus its inquiry on whether the employee’s acts were discretionary.”
  • failure to remove a tree in a Lake Mendocino recreation area campground
  • courts “must 17 not focus on or even consider the employee’s actual thinking 18 about what to do or not do, or the status of the employee, or the 19 ‘routine or frequent nature’ of the discretionary act.”
  • “If the policy is mandatory, it cannot be discretionary.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

2 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

26 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.