Ninth Circuit· 10/28/2020
Phong Lam v. United States
Citations
- 979 F.3d 665
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- “it is well-established that negligence is not 13 part of the discretionary function exception analysis.”
- “[T]he district court must not focus on or even consider the employee’s actual thinking about what to do or not do.”
- “[C]ourts should put the negligence issue aside on a [discretionary function exception]-based motion to dismiss and focus its inquiry on whether the employee’s acts were discretionary.”
- failure to remove a tree in a Lake Mendocino recreation area campground
- courts “must 17 not focus on or even consider the employee’s actual thinking 18 about what to do or not do, or the status of the employee, or the 19 ‘routine or frequent nature’ of the discretionary act.”
- “If the policy is mandatory, it cannot be discretionary.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Cited by
2 cases in this archive cite this case.
Cites
26 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- United States v. GaubertSupreme Court· 1991-03-26· cited 2,087×
- Berkovitz v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1988-06-13· cited 1,883×
- Dalehite v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1953-06-08· cited 1,757×
- United States v. S.A. Empresa De Viacao Aerea Rio GrandenseSupreme Court· 1984-06-19· cited 1,618×
- Indian Towing Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1955-11-21· cited 1,289×
- Lorrin Whisnant, Individually v. United StatesNinth Circuit· 2005-03-11· cited 180×
- Nell D. Autery, as Administratrix of the Estate of Roy Franklin Autery Charlotte Schreiner v. United StatesEleventh Circuit· 1993-06-11· cited 160×
- Felix Valdez v. United StatesNinth Circuit· 1995-06-08· cited 149×
- Terbush v. United StatesNinth Circuit· 2008-02-21· cited 142×
- Sabow v. United StatesNinth Circuit· 1996-08-28· cited 140×
- Kendra Summers, a Minor, and Frederick J. Summers, Guardian Ad Litem v. United StatesNinth Circuit· 1990-06-26· cited 103×
- Merando v. United StatesThird Circuit· 2008-02-20· cited 83×
- Gatx/airlog Company Gatx Capital Corporation Airlog Management Corporation Frederick L. Hatton and Sanford P. Burnstein v. United StatesNinth Circuit· 2002-04-19· cited 80×
- Bartley H. O'TOOle Lilly E. O'TOOle v. United StatesNinth Circuit· 2002-07-10· cited 67×
- Gonzalez Ex Rel. A.F. v. United StatesNinth Circuit· 2016-02-24· cited 67×
- Chadd Ex Rel. Estate of Boardman v. United StatesNinth Circuit· 2015-07-27· cited 60×
- Childers v. United StatesNinth Circuit· 1994-11-30· cited 59×
- Arizona Maintenance Co. v. United StatesNinth Circuit· 1989-01-10· cited 48×
- Myers v. United StatesNinth Circuit· 2011-07-15· cited 47×
- Camozzi v. Roland/Miller & Hope Consulting GroupNinth Circuit· 1989-01-20· cited 46×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.