Phoenix v. Reddish

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that “there is no Supreme Court or Second Circuit authority that imposes an affirmative duty on a non-police state actor . . . to intervene”
• granting summary judgment as to a § 1983 conspiracy claim where the private entity and state actor were named as defendants
• “The plaintiffs only evidence of a conspiracy is that [the defendant] was present when the alleged unconstitutional conduct occurred. This amounts to nothing, more than rank speculation and conjecture....”
• “The plaintiffs only evidence of a conspiracy is that [defendant] was present when the alleged unconstitutional conduct occurred. This amounts to nothing more than rank speculation and conjecture .... ”
• “[T]here is no Supreme Court or Second Circuit authority that imposes an affirmative duty on a non-police state actor . . . to intervene to prevent a police officer from conducting an unlawful search and seizure.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).