Phoenix & Third National Bank v. Cassell

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding that where plaintiff who claimed to have been misled by a third party as to the applicable deadline failed to explain how he was misled, plaintiff’s claims were not equitably tolled
• characterizing termination, disparate disciplining, and negative performance evaluations as discrete acts
• finding plaintiff’s claims were not subject to equitable tolling where plaintiff argued in “conclusory fashion” that third party had misled him as to the filing deadline and where plaintiff made no allegation that defendant had misled him
• “To the extent Plaintiff relies on Defendant’s various reprimands or negative performance reviews, these are also discrete acts.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).