Phoenix Insurance Co. v. Ed Boland Construction, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that an objector sufficiently complained to the municipality that the defendant was expanding the physical \footprint\ of his property by expanding the motel's fence and boardwalk area around the pool into the public boardwalk right of way
• relaxing a multi-year delay in filing an action in lieu of prerogative writs under Rule 4:69-6(c), because the issue involved a matter of \important public interest\
• explaining objector's right to pursue mandamus action when municipality's zoning officer failed to respond to complaints about zoning violations
• allowing an action in lieu of prerogative writs to proceed despite a multi -year A-3895-23 10 delay because the issue involved a matter of \important public interest\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).